Week 7 Prompt
It's hard not to have a strong opinion about fake memoirs, and the issues of appropriated and misrepresented identity overall. Conversations about these issues can quickly become confrontational and divisive, and so I was pleasantly surprised by the New Yorker article by Louis Menand. It maintained a tone of curiosity, and it never seemed to be virtue-signaling or broadly condemning any viewpoint or group. At the same time, it did not seem like Menand was trying too hard to be neutral or inoffensive. He frankly criticizes the era of dishonest discourse ushered in by Donald Trump. He addresses the obvious ethical problems associated with literary "hoaxes," but he also explains the arguments in defense of hoaxes. It never feels as though he is pointing a finger. I mention this, because I think that this article is a good example of the correct way to talk about these issues, especially for those of us who will need to do so as readers' advisors and library workers. ...